A Take on Kosovo
01/31/2008
For a few months now, I’ve been trying to explain my POV on the Kosovo issue to friends, without making much headway. Some of my thoughts on the subject can be found here: Kosovo-Will Serbia go to War. Basically, I disagree with the position that Serbia is not giving up its territory and that it is in no position to have say in whether or rather on what terms the province should have its independence. One of the opposing views is that it is up to Kosovo to win its independence, not up to Serbia to ‘allow’ it.
Today, I came across a blog post by Tony Barber that for the most part puts ever so eloquently the disorganised thoughts running through my head. Here are a few quotes:
…From being top dogs in the multinational Yugoslav communist party, army and bureaucracy, they found themselves either penned into the smaller state of Serbia or converted into ethnic minorities…
…well-known sentiments regarding Kosovo…
…This sense of victimhood persists and blends with more specific grievances about Kosovo. Here it is not so much a question of memories of the Ottoman defeat of the Serbs at the 1389 battle of Kosovo Polje… in the century following Serbia’s recovery of Kosovo in 1912, the ethnic Albanian component of the province’s population has increased to the point that most Serbs can see for themselves that, in demographic terms, the struggle is all but lost…
…and the bit I agree with wholeheartedly…
…The EU is therefore misguided if it thinks it can sugar the pill of Kosovo’s independence with the offer of visas and some subsidised schooling for Serbs at a German or Portuguese university.
…and…
…most Serbs are unlikely to take seriously such well-intentioned foreign attempts to guide them down the path of virtue…
So again, I hope that whether or not Serbia is entitled to a say in the issue of Kosovo’s independence in the eyes of the EU or the US that keeps one of its largest military bases in the world in Kosovo, a region that is positioned strategically
The main purpose for the Bondsteel military base is to provide security for the construction of the Albanian-Macedonian-Bulgarian oil pipeline (AMBO). The AMBO trans-Balkan pipeline will link up with the corridors between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea basin, which holds close to 50 billion barrels of oil. (source)
and holds an enviable reserves of lignite, which are estimated at around 12 billion tonnes (source), other natural resources and fertile land with cheap labour to boot, I do hope that they offer Serbia what its people will consider fair compensation for lost territories and resources. Considering what’s at stake, it shouldn’t be so hard to offer the country something more tangible than the EU freer trade, visa liberalisation and educational exchanges carrot as Tony Barber put it.
To conclude, I do believe Kosovo should gain its independence, but on fair terms and in peace. While this may not be a popular sentiment here, I do not believe Slovenia should be the first to recognize Kosovo independence. If for no other reason, then for the sake of our investments in Serbia. They are massive and putting salt on open wounds is bound to be a turnoff even for the best of friends.
Adriaan said,
January 31, 2008 @ 12:13 pm
Thanks, Dr Fil, for pointing me towards an article which makes considerable sense of a subject I appreciated but barely understood.
Things seem a touch clearer now.
Keep up the good work.
Krajnc B. said,
January 31, 2008 @ 12:14 pm
For sure, that Slovenia will not be the first state to recognize Kosovo as independent country, because Albanian President Bamir Topi already said, when he visited Pristina, that Albania will recognize Kosovo in “not just first sec. but in the first tenth of sec”. Our politicians are to slow to beat albanians in this, and thanks god for it.
pengovsky said,
January 31, 2008 @ 1:18 pm
A good post and the article is a marvelous find ð Also, I competely undestand your sentinemt and your wish for a peaceful breakup (which I think we all share), but your argument is fatally flawed.
“I do hope that they offer Serbia what its people will consider fair compensation for lost territories and resources.”
What you are saying is that Serbia is somehow entitled to those territores and resources. By extention this means that Serbia should be compensated for the loss of the Adriatic coast (both Croatian and Montenegrin), Lake Bled and KrÅ¡ko Nuclear Power Plant – to name but a few….
I also understand (and to an extent agree with) your statement that the last thing that is needed is to pour salt on their wounds. However – may I remind you that if we follow your line of thought, other countries – against which Serbia waged war (be it directly or by a proxy) can claim damages from Serbia whose leadership inflicted many wounds to the peoples of Yougoslavia, with the deepest ones not even close to being healed… Not to menition that pussyfooting around Serbia means pouring salt on wounds Serbia inflicted on Croatia and especially Bosnia-Herzegovina.
There is no nice way of doing this and the apparently inevitable independence of Kosovo is only the final stage of dissolution of Yugoslavia. It is paintful, yes – and perhaps I can ever be persuaded that Slovenia should take its time with recognising Kosovo (although there are other aspects which in my opinion make an immediate recognition desirable) – but what message is the EU sending to Turkey, Macedonia, Bosnia and, yes, Croatia, if it gives Serbia prefferential treatment? Why should any of these countries go about joining the EU in a normal way when so much more can be gained by just causing trouble?
dr.filomena said,
January 31, 2008 @ 2:06 pm
@P: I do think you’re comparing apples to oranges in this case. Despite its regional authorities, Kosovo was/is part of Serbia, while Lake Bled for example never was. As far as their investment into the common Yugoslav project goes, this is an issue in the scope of succession of the former SFRJ.
However, it is the final sentence that illustrates our differing takes on the subject. You say: “Why should any of these countries go about joining the EU in a normal way when so much more can be gained by just causing trouble?”
Firstly, as far as I know, joining the EU is not seen as number 1 priority in Serbia and most people are convinced they are better off outside the union. But, if I go along with this premise and a deal were struck and Serbia received some sort of compensation (not just a promise of potential EU membership, but something tangible, as in… well… money), I’d think the other countries could view it as:
“Life in peace and joining the EU are so important to Serbia that it is willing to let go of a part of its territory (ok, that’s been lost demographically a long time ago) and not cause trouble in return for EU membership.”
dr.filomena said,
January 31, 2008 @ 6:00 pm
@Adriaan: Thanks for the kind words!
@Krajnc B.: You have a valid point there! And by the way, welcome to the blog ð
Global Voices Online » Serbia, Slovenia: Kosovo Independence said,
January 31, 2008 @ 11:41 pm
[…] Filomena writes on Kosovo's independence and explains why she thinks Slovenia should not be the first to […]
frickingserb said,
February 1, 2008 @ 1:11 pm
The article is a good example of twisted logic (and rotten mind).
The only thing Serbia mustn’t take is 30 silver coins for Kosovo – hopefully it won’t happen, but if some of Serbian Quislings try, he should be sent to accompany the Mother of all Serbian Quislings – Sjindjic.
BTW, I never ceased boycotting Slovenian goods – except of four pair of socks my wife bought at bargain without paying attention to the manufacturer. I hope I’ll live to see the day all Slovenian investments in Serbia are overtaken and Slovenians face closed doors everywhere in Serbia.
pengovsky said,
February 1, 2008 @ 3:54 pm
Is it really that bad? I mean, it’s just a nation declaring independence. We’ve seen plenty of this in the past two decades…
SLEEPING WITH PENGOVSKY » Blog Archive » Niko ne sme da vas bije said,
February 10, 2008 @ 2:20 am
[…] some prominent politicians (incluing Former President Milan KuÄan) and some highly-respectable bloggers think otherwise, I’m covinced there are scores of reasons for immediate recognition of […]
DougguoD said,
February 10, 2008 @ 7:53 pm
Sorry to hear about the socks, FrickingSerb. My condolences.
Global Voices Online » Kosovo: Towards Independence? said,
February 15, 2008 @ 12:54 am
[…] “if for no other reason, then for the sake of our investments in Serbia.” She also discusses whether Serbia should be entitled to have a say in the matter and be compensated for Kosov…: I hope that whether or not Serbia is entitled to a say in the issue of Kosovoâs independence in […]