Slur-happy Prime Minister Hopeful Blocks Citizens on Twitter
10/08/2011
Raven (photo by dr. fil)
So, Janez Janša, the man considered most likely to form Slovenia’s next government, took the time to block me on Twitter. Along with more than a dozen other people, some of them journalists. Although I fail to see why he felt this was called for, I suppose I should feel flattered. The party he leads, the SDS, is employing the same policy and is blocking Twitter users as well. Me, for example. If their social media use tips came from the same people as Rick Perry‘s, they would be well advised to ask for an update on good Twitter Policy.
Less than two months to go until the early elections in Slovenia and it shows. This time around, with left-wing voters disappointed with the soon-to-be-former government yet not ready to live through another reign of the coalition which preceded it, and right-wingers feeling victorious before election day, flux is the word of the day.
As is usually the case in this country, any and I do mean any public debate soon turns into a cockfight over who contributed most to Slovenia’s independence and, without fail, whose ancestors fought on which side in WW2. Sad, really. Family ties to famous or infamous people – depending on one’s point of view – are quickly used in lieu of arguments. Remember, this is a nation of two million. Everyone is related or connected in some way if you look hard enough.
Dismissive is the new black
The level of debate is non-existent. I wanted to say appalling, but there really is no debate. Sure, we have lots of people talking, but not to each other. It is far too easy to gain political points by labelling adversaries with insulting abbreviations and nick names, repeating lies until they seem so familiar that they ring true and, surprisingly enough, by showing flagrant disrespect for all institutions, even the Constitutional Court.
The strongest opposition party, the SDS has been campaigning for the last three years, ever since having lost the previous elections. A result which they have been painting as questionable ever since. The party leader is rather slur-happy and his faithful party members and his associates have masted the art of disqualification. The party leader and his supporters, for example, have no problem calling the previous ruling coalition the KGB, an acronym for the first names of the coalition members’ leaders, while crying bloody murder if any similarly distasteful remark is directed at them.
Block
As I mentioned, Janez Janša blocked a number of profiles on Twitter, including mine. While I am sure that it is easier and more heart-warming to read only those questions and comments that flatter the undoubtedly important Slovene politician, a wise man considers critical thought and does not build fences to prevent the thoughts of those who do not march to his drum from coming to his attention.
I hope SDS wins the elections
Now for the twist in this story. I actually hope the SDS led by Janez Janša wins these elections. They have been working hard for three years to have them happen. Which does not mean they are responsible for the dissolution of the coalition, of course. Anyhow, for three years, these people have spared no insult, no insinuation, have not missed any opportunity to question the credibility and even legitimacy of the team that governed Slovenia during the worst period of the world economic crisis. It is time for them to show they can do better.
It is time that SDS took over and showed its expertise not only in talking, but in doing. Structural reforms are difficult to carry out in the best of times, let alone during a long period of hardship. It was greatly due to SDS campaigning that the three structural reforms proposed by the Government and adopted by the Parliament fell at referendums. So much for parliamentary democracy.
It is time they took responsibility, formed structural reforms of their own and convinced the people not to turn down laws that will inevitably make them work for their pensions longer, for example, at a referendum. Good luck there. Unless they change the referendum legislation first. How could they? The will of the people comes first.
I am slightly concerned that the man who hopes to bring Slovenia out of the economic crisis and make it as prosperous as the country and its people deserve, has sufficient time on his hands to invest his energy into choosing the citizens to block on Twitter.
Ah, but I forget. No promises are being made. Voters are promised nothing more than a change in leadership. All the rest will follow gradually and economic recovery is only forecast to become apparent toward the end of the new government’s reign. A time frame that roughly coincides with the estimate of economists for the world’s economic recovery, but surely, this must be sheer coincidence.
I hope that the only Slovene party and the only Slovene politician to my knowledge who have made it a policy to block users, including journalists, on Twitter, will be able to show a tad more openness if they form the next government. A country run by bigots would be no fun to live in.
Jay-Z And 99 Problems | SLEEPING WITH PENGOVSKY said,
October 8, 2011 @ 11:37 pm
[…] is likely to make it to the end of its regular term in the next couple of years. In fact, as the good doctor noted, Janez Janša worked long and hard to derail the reform attempts by the outgoing government and he […]
jaKa said,
October 9, 2011 @ 8:23 am
nah, I must disagree with the closing line. the country *will* be run by bigots, and it’s going to be fun to live in.
Ziva said,
October 9, 2011 @ 8:58 am
I’m not giving up just yet and since I care to live here for a while longer I don’t want to see any ridiculous and passive ‘let’s see what they are capable off’ experiments and let them win the elections.
Barbara said,
October 9, 2011 @ 9:37 am
I had a similar experience on FB, but it was a coalition member who blocked me. I was never insulting in any way, suppose I was just pushing the right buttons. But it ws a slightly different theme – the constitutional court’s decision to uphold the citizens of Ankaran, and young Mr. Juri changed his opinion on that matter like the wind. I resented that, and obviously did’t have the right answers…
Whatever, as you said, it concerns me also, that the people’s representatives have so much time on their hands for such errands. And more so, that they think the solution is as easy as that. Or, and that’s to fear, that they think it should be as easy as that.
dr.filomena said,
October 9, 2011 @ 10:10 am
@jaKa: Your comment is irrelevant since you are bound to have fun no matter what circumstances 😉 That said, I must actually agree.
@Ziva: It’s good to hear that you’re not ready to give up. I get the feeling that fewer people are ready to throw in the towel than it may seem at a glance. Sometimes one needs to take a step back to start progressing faster. Timing is all-important.
@Barbara: You make an excellent point.
pengovsky said,
October 9, 2011 @ 10:42 am
@JaKa: You can say that again!
@Ziva: It’s not about letting them win, but rather making them pay the political price for making the situation worse than it needed to be.
@Barbara: Ah, the young Mr. Juri… Shameful, really.
Si. R. said,
October 10, 2011 @ 1:09 am
But Dear, it’s just his fight for the booty! For him and his “team”. For his “people”. The creme de la creme of the projected third of the nation’s voters willing to invest their Sunday matinée time to cast a vote – the vote of destruction.
And then we will all know who our Daddy is …
(po naški: videćemo boga svoga … )
lady said,
October 10, 2011 @ 8:59 am
get a life..
alcessa said,
October 10, 2011 @ 11:11 am
They Toot, Hordes, Don’t They?
Mitja said,
October 12, 2011 @ 12:38 pm
A ta ‘svojih’ pa nič ne omenjate??? Gospoda golubiča, ki je celo javno pozival naj se blokira ali neha slediti Janezu Janši naprimer…
Oh, sorry for my Slovenian question as we are Slovenians I prefer my Language first…
So, my question to the writer is: Why do you not mention ‘your guys’. Like gregor golubič who was publically requesting on Twitter not to follow Janez Janša. Just one of the examples.
pengovsky said,
October 12, 2011 @ 12:51 pm
Actually, it was about Žiga Turk, not Janez Janša, so no points for accuracy.
Secondly, in your Slovene part of the comment you said “unfollow or block”, which is not true. It was simply about unfollowing. And Unfollow is not the same as Block
Thirdly: you can read that tweet any way you like. I read it as a statement, not a call to action.
Lastly: blocking journalists and ordinary citizens is somewhat more problematic than simply unfollowing a fellow politician n my opinon
dr.filomena said,
October 12, 2011 @ 1:25 pm
Mitja, read the final paragraph. The only politician and the only party afaik. First names and family names are capitalized both in Slovene and English. You may want to check your spelling, too.
Mitja said,
October 12, 2011 @ 2:30 pm
OK guys, you got my point though.
It was about ZZTurk, right, my bad, deepest apologize. But it’s not about the person but about the action. And yeah you said it just right Pengovsky. We read the things just the way we WANT. Unfortunately MOST of us do. And it’s not about bolock or unfollow or whatever. At least by my point of view the actions are quite similar.
I am nationalist I admit it right away. So one of those you liberals dislike the most. And we will never agree on some things. The problem is just that we all are forcing our ideas to the others like our beliefs are the only truth that can exist. With me being no exception. I guess the real democracy is to accept the other’s beliefs. And unfortunately in our beloved Slovenia nor left winged neither right winged (unfortunately by my point of view we even do not have the real right winged party) people we are prepared to take such actions. I am sure you are well respected people (Dr. Filomena included) as much as I can se from your social network profiles and I was expecting you to criticise the scene in whole not only one side and in this article it didn’t happen.
Dr. Filomena: you are right, I wrote it in passion. Sometimes I just do not give myself time to think it over and I get in numerous trouble for that. But it’s me to pay the price for that. I did it for total direspect towards that person.
dr.filomena said,
October 12, 2011 @ 8:00 pm
Mitja, thank you for the compliment. I feel no need to criticize everyone when one person or group of people behaves in a way I find unacceptable. Janez Janša has every right to use the block function provided by Twitter, but using it to prevent communication not with spammers but with people who simply do not take his every word as gospel, is lame. It says much more about him than the people he chose to block.
No other Slovene politician (to the best of my knowledge) has employed this tactic. Mr Golobič did express his frustration with Mr. Turk’s tweets and completed his tweet with “Unfollow!” but has not afaik blocked Mr Turk and has talked to him on Twitter since. Since you bring him up, you may try to check his Twitter stream. I tnk you will find that he tends to interact with people, including those who do not particularly appreciate him. What a difference in approach in comparison to Janša.
Certainly, I can understand passion and impulsiveness. I am, after all, an Aries 🙂 However, if this society is to make progress, we will need to start talking to each other, including those we do not agree with. And for that to happen, we will need to learn to show respect even for people we do not care for.
Slovenia: Notes on the Dec. 4 Early Elections · Global Voices said,
October 13, 2011 @ 12:21 am
[…] Filomena writes that Janez Janša, “the man considered most likely to form Slovenia’s next […]
normaln said,
October 19, 2011 @ 10:00 am
> I actually hope the SDS led by Janez Janša wins these elections.
If you really mean that you will contribute to it!! Before leaving the polling booth you will take a photograph of your ballot paper. After you’ve crossed out a party, of course. You will publish the photo on Dec 4 at 7.05 PM CET, immediately after polling stations close. We will watch!!!!
By the way, among many inaccurate statements, the following one requires a special attention:
> It was greatly due to SDS campaigning that the three structural reforms proposed by the Government and adopted by the Parliament fell at referendums.
Wrong, wrong, pathetically wrong! Komunist is obviously your only source of information. No, that wasn’t SDS. True, they proposed some minor referendums (archives etc.), but the “structural reform” ones were requested by, ehmmm, how to say, FDV student associations and trade unions. More precisely, not any trade union but the ortho communist Salmonelić’s one.
John McEnroe said,
October 19, 2011 @ 10:08 am
Normaln, you should stop propagating Communism even though I can’t blame you for it – in the SDS the communistic regime practices of discreditation and then … (you know what) are seemingly still very much alive.
The SDS with its discreditation politics of each and every single one governmental institution, and even the President of the Republic of Slovenia itself as the ultimate national political figure, were always sending out propagandistic signals and agitating for this and that. Even though they did not formally start any incentives they surely were a major contributor to the situation.
So its not “wrong, wrong, pathetically wrong”. If you really think so, you should look in the mirror and post a photo of your bedazzledness.
pengovsky said,
October 19, 2011 @ 10:49 am
@normaln:
C’mon! There’s a world of difference between “proposing” a referendum (which is what you wrote) and “campaigning for a NO vote” which is what the good doctor wrote. SDS had a great role and a lot of vested interest in defeating the reforms.
The rest of your comment must have been meant as a joke, of course 🙂
dr.filomena said,
October 19, 2011 @ 9:23 pm
@normaln: Surely, the political party assessing its reach at 50+ per cent of Slovenia’s voters can win without my humble single vote. The thought of casting a vote for a party that blocked me on Twitter without good cause is rather revolting. No need to employ Big Brother on this one. I’ll just say it out loud here: I will not vote for SDS.
Which other statements are you referring to? This generalisation is a sweet example of disqualification I speak of, by the way. As you correctly quoted, I claimed SDS campaigned against the reforms. Not initiated the referendum procedures, but campaigned against the acts adopted by the Parliament. It’s hard to argue with what John McEnroe wrote above in his second paragraph. Just as in illustration of how involved SDS was, here is a telling link: Janez Janša voted early, casting a NO vote three times, three days before the regular date of the referendum. He did so very publicly. Would you call that campaigning against the reforms yourself?
Interesting, that you refer to “some referendums” as “minor”. Considering the power referendums have and how much they cost, I dare not classify any of them as “minor”. Although it is true that sometimes, political players abuse the system and taxpayer money by forcing a referendum on non-vital issues with the sole purpose of gaining political points.
ա said,
October 21, 2011 @ 4:12 pm
So much about your (and your posts’) credibility…
dr.filomena said,
October 21, 2011 @ 5:24 pm
@ա: Do you care to elaborate?
hs said,
November 13, 2011 @ 4:29 pm
Another case of a brain implant (© Dr. von Sicherle) when searching for problems at wrong places. Elaborated in detail in this excellent article by TheGreatThinker™ .
Dr. Filomena » Macho Land Slovenia said,
February 3, 2012 @ 8:05 pm
[…] am not a feminist activist by any stretch of imagination, but while I was actually rooting for Janša & co. to take power, the team that will be proposed tomorrow leaves much to be desired. Some […]